2012年11月29日木曜日

Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity


Toshio Yamagishi, Yutaka Horita, Nobuhiro Mifune, Hirofumi Hashimoto, Yang Li, Mizuho Shinada, Arisa Miura, Keigo Inukai, Haruto Takagishi, and Dora Simunovic
Published online before print November 27, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212126109
PNAS November 27, 2012 201212126

最後通牒ゲームでの不公平提案拒否は「強い互恵性(不公平な提案に罰を与え、公平な提案には報いる)」の証拠にはならない。「信頼ゲームでの互恵的行動(投資された金額を返す)」や「SVOのProsociality」等と(個人間で)相関しないから。

「じゃあ、最後通牒ゲームでの不公平提案拒否は何なの?」については今後の課題。著者らは「下の立場に置かれる事を回避するため(←訳が微妙…)」と主張(推測)しているが、このデータだけでは何とも言えない気がする…たぶん別の実験が必要。

The strong reciprocity model of the evolution of human cooperation has gained some acceptance, partly on the basis of support from experimental findings. The observation that unfair offers in the ultimatum game are frequently rejected constitutes an important piece of the experimental evidence for strong reciprocity. In the present study, we have challenged the idea that the rejection response in the ultimatum game provides evidence of the assumption held by strong reciprocity theorists that negative reciprocity observed in the ultimatum game is inseparably related to positive reciprocity as the two sides of a preference for fairness. The prediction of an inseparable relationship between positive and negative reciprocity was rejected on the basis of the results of a series of experiments that we conducted using the ultimatum game, the dictator game, the trust game, and the prisoner’s dilemma game. We did not find any correlation between the participants’ tendencies to reject unfair offers in the ultimatum game and their tendencies to exhibit various prosocial behaviors in the other games, including their inclinations to positively reciprocate in the trust game. The participants’ responses to postexperimental questions add support to the view that the rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is a tacit strategy for avoiding the imposition of an inferior status.

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿